The first question I asked in my presentation is what compels people to watch movies and TV shows online? I'm sure that everyone has their own reasons for doing it but I decided to list the most common reasons:
- You can watch new releases from the comfort of your own home: No need to worry about booking a cinema ticket in advance or finding a parking space near the cinema. All you need to do is stream the movie on your laptop, park up on your couch and enjoy the show.
- You can watch it whenever suits you: You no longer have to be in front of your TV's at 9 tuesday night to see Grey's Anatomy. You no longer have to be a prisoner to the cinema timetable. You decide when you want to watch.
- No longer have to wait weeks for TV shows to be aired on Irish television: The days where we had to wait up to 3 months after our American counterparts to watch our favourite shows are now over. We can view them online minutes after the show airs on TV in the US.
- The most important factor to most people is the fact that it's free: The risk involved when you go to the cinema is now gone. You no longer have to worry about wasting 10 euro on a movie you're unsure about. You can watch and leave the movie at anytime knowing that although you've lost time you'll never get back at least you didn't waste your money.
The most popular sites that I came across for streaming movies and TV shows online were:
http://www.sidereel.com/_home
http://ch131.com/
http://www.free-tv-video-online.info/
http://www.megavideo.com/
http://www.tvduck.com/
When I visited these sites I started to wonder that with so much to gin from these sites what could possibly be the problem with watching all my favourite shows online?
The main problem with watching your favourite TV shows online is that the shows lose ratings on TV and thus run the risk of being cancelled. If the show is cancelled then you can't watch it anywhere whether it is online or on TV. Another big problem I found was the quality of the picture. Is it really worth scrificing the quality of the movie or show just to be able to see it a few days erlier than normal?
The next question that came up was what does this mean for the TV stations?
They’re losing out on viewers as audiences either don’t want to wait for it to be aired on TV or else don’t want to be constricted to having to watch the show at a particular place at a particular time. How are the they combating this? Well they're no longer risking the drop in ratings by holding off broadcasting tv shows months after they've aired in the US. Gone are the days when we had to wait months longer than our American counterparts. A large number of US shows are now being broadcast in Europe just days after airing in the US. The two biggest examples of this are Lost and Glee. Lost airs in Europe just 2 days after it does in the US, while Glee has it's European premiere on Irish channel TV3 the day after it's US airing.
TV bosses have put a plan into action but how are the movie studios reacting to this trend and the loss of revenue it brings? With the content available online cinema attendances decrease accordingly. Movie studios are realising that they’re going to have to find alternative ways to attract audiences to the cinema. They no longer have to sell just a movie; they have to sell an experience. The first of these is 3D:
The release of Avatar in 3D is another example of the studios attempts to draw in the crowds. Although James Cameron didn’t invent the technology as purely a gimmick to up cinema attendaces, most of Avatar’s marketing campaign was based around the "experience" of seeing the film in 3D. The end result was Avatar became the highest grossing movie of all time with gross of over $2.7 billion dollars. Studio bosses are so confident of 3D’s pulling power that they still believe there is more money to be made from Avatar. 20th Century Fox plan to re-release the movie in the summer. Other movies are following suit. Studios are now 3Difying their movies in the hopes of attracting bigger audiences. For the most part it is working but using 3D where it isn’t needed will only work for so long…..
So what's the alternative to gimmicks such as 3D? A good PR campaign can go long way. A prime example being The Dark Knight. In May 2007, a PR company named 42 Entertainment, began a viral marketing campaign utilizing the film's "Why So Serious?" tagline. They launched a website featuring the fictional political campaign of Harvey Dent, with the caption, "I Believe in Harvey Dent." The site aimed to interest fans by having them work and earn images from the film. For example they had to go on scvenger hunts and find clues that lead them to footage and audio from the film. The campaign went on for over a year from May 2007 until the film’s release in August 2008. The campaign was so successful that by the film’s release the fans’ excitement was at fever pitch. Warner Bros. Managed to keep copies of the finished film underwraps until after the opening weekend. The End Result? The Dark Knight took the record for the biggest ever opening weekend gross. It made $158,411,483 on it’s opening weekend and became only the 4th ever film to earn over $1 billion worldwide. Even when the movie was available to view online, people opted to experience it in the cinema instead.
Conclusion
There are many positives to watching TV and Movies online but do they outweigh the negatives? Is it worth being able to watch TV shows and movies online if we're hurting the industry that produces them? Is it worth diminishing the quality of a movie for the sake of convenience?
That’s for you to decide.
References:
http://batman-dark-knight.moviechronicles.com/category/batman-promotional/
http://friendsofharveydent.org/
http://boxofficemojo.com/
http://www.imdb.com/
http://www.empireonline.com/
